Skip to content

A few ways editorial and ad staffs could interact

June 19, 2009

In Ghostbusters, it’s thrown out early in the movie that “crossing the streams” is the worst possible thing that could happen. Of course, in the non-spoof ending (which curiously isn’t on YouTube), crossing the streams ends up being the thing that saves the world.

I don’t know if co-mingling editorial and ad-sales staffs at news outlets will necessarily save journalism, but it sure as hell won’t kill it. Here are a few instances in which I think editorial and ad staffs could team up for mutual benefit:

When editorial knows what it’s got planned content-wise (long term). Say you’ve got a big “back to school” package piece set to roll out in print and online. You know who your audience is: Parents with kids and the kids themselves (to a lesser extent). Let your ad team know about it in advance—they can target their sales calls to businesses/organizations who would want to advertise around that content (stores planning back-to-school sales, Boys & Girls Clubs rolling out after-school activities, etc.).

When an ad is also a story. A&W restaurants across the country are giving away free root beer floats today and people are excited about it. I actually had a guy flag me down on Twitter and ask if the deal was good at a specific location. Know what would’ve been a great deal? Contacting the local A&W before hand and offering a little quid pro quo—for instance, we’ll offer to tease the giveaway in print/online if A&W offers free newspapers, too (or something that advertises our content).

Product placement. Before you X the tab you’re in, watch this video:

Now imagine if we would have scanned, say, 100 products in that store and then sent our ad sales teams after those companies: “We’ve got a video on this iPhone app coming out and for X dollars, we’ll include a shot of your product in the video.” The products featured are just ancillary to the real story (the app) and I’d argue there’s really no conflict of interest. Normally we’d just arbitrarily choose about 10 shots out of 100 (assuming they’re all of the same quality, etc.) during the editing process, so what’s the harm if that process becomes selective and makes money?

2 Comments leave one →
  1. June 20, 2009 10:47 am

    I find the last idea interesting and valid. Radio pulls this kind of thing all the time. Also- that product- could kill on college campuses where students are trying to ‘beat the bookstore’ with the correct edition of a textbook for a lower cost. [assuming the bookstore is not run by the school but instead Follet or B&N, for example]

  2. June 21, 2009 3:06 pm

    Ben – In that case, I’ll have to listen to more radio (got any examples/links offhand?).

    As for the app, it’s good, though I suspect only if you have a 3GS. My coworker downloaded it the other day and it’s just as fast as advertised, once you learn how to use it. The only big limitation is that it only works for 12-digit barcodes–something I assume could change a few updates down the line. Seriously, though: That app plus the Kindle or Kindle app would revolutionize how text books are bought and used.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: